Looking for:
Why single gender schools are a bad idea
Click here to ENTER
Jun 16, 2 comments. When it comes to choosing schools, parents consider whether they should send their kids to single gender schools or not. However, parents do not know that separating boys and girls in school may harm kids in ways that may not be noticeable. When kids get out of school, they must learn how to interact with people of the opposite gender. Kids must be in an environment where they can learn social skills and how to interact with the opposite gender.
Lacking social skills will become a huge burden to them when they get into work or even just talking to people of the opposite gender. Having good social skills is the key to having a successful future, so instead of letting kids have a hard time in the future, why not make them go to co-ed school and improve their social skills when they are still young?
Single-sex schools seem to be good for school discipline, performance, and provide learning space for teaching and concentration. Researchers generally find that gender segregation leads to students believing strong stereotypes and prejudices. In co-ed schools, students get to interact with the other gender frequently and learn to talk with other genders comfortably.
In order to stop gender stereotypes from spreading, people should send kids to co-ed schools to prevent them from internalizing these prejudices. As we can see, the disadvantages of single schools outweigh their advantages. I disagree. I believe single-sex schools encourage further development of both boys and girls. There is actually less rigidity in education and in social interaction when you understand your classmates better.
The curriculum is tailored to your needs and you as a student have more say and power when you are not competing with the opposite sex. There are always clubs to further interact with students from other schools, so lack of social interaction is less of a worry. In my experience, my school gave me the necessary resources and support to excel in the activities I chose to pursue. Maybe middle school is different from high school, but the best high schools in Taiwan are nearly all separated by sex.
It is a pleasure to study with the brightest minds and enjoy the same activities after class. Most of us have no difficulty socialising with the opposite sex, nor are we less empowered than our co-ed counterparts. I agree with you. I think it just depends on what personality you have. For example, if you know you are more of an introvert, you should go to a co-ed school. In a co-ed school, you can learn more about socializing.
Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Submit Comment. Why single gender schools are a bad idea Edwina Tong — Grade 8 Jun 16, 2 comments. Angel C on August 14, at pm. Megan Ong on January 27, at am. Submit a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Recent Comments Noah on Percussion instruments that look easy but are actually extremely difficult to play Henry Lin — Grade 10 AmogusProgrammer on OpEd: 4 reasons why junior high math is useless Kyle Huang — Grade 8 AmogusProgrammer on OpEd: 4 reasons why junior high math is useless Kyle Huang — Grade 8 Alradi amin on 4 reasons why living in the city is better than living in the countryside Victor Lu — Grade 10 Leo on 4 reasons why living in the city is better than living in the countryside Victor Lu — Grade Load More Follow on Instagram.
The Dangers of Single-Sex Education | ACLU of Maine.Single gender schools are a bad idea. by julia manosky
Skip to main content. Recently, a school in Wood County, West Virginia agreed to abolish for two years its single-sex education practice in which boys and girls were segregated to separate classrooms.
This was after legal action was levied by the ACLU on behalf of a Wood County family who believed the program was sexist. This recent occurrence brings an interesting and little discussed topic to light: single-sex education. If you are from the Northeast and not West Virginia, perhaps the phrase evokes scenes of prim girls in skirts learning needlepoint or dour faced Choate boys before the Rosemary Hall addition.
But it turns out single-sex education is far more common then most think, and not just applied to the wealthy. Just last session, the ACLU of Maine worked to defeat a bill that would have legalized the single-sex education programs across the state. Thankfully, the the campaign was a success and the bill was defeated!
A Feminist Minority Report stated that more than 1, public schools segregated at least some of their classes after when the Title IX regulations changed. Single-sex education is increasigly used as a tool to promote certain skills in young men and women respectively, and is often seen as a solution for encouraging learning and good behavior for boys low-income areas. So is single-sex education merely a harmless, occasionally helpful practice for people of all incomes?
Well, this recent lawsuit in fact reveals a darker side to this method. Here's two major reasons why single-sex education can do more harm than good:. Single-sex schools promote gender stereotypes and homophobia – One of the most important battles in our nations war of equality is the fight for LGBT rights and affirming the civil liberties of LGBT individuals. However, if we are ever to truly absolve the rampant ignorance, bias and hostility against LGBT individuals in this country, we have to seize this weed at its roots.
And the root of much homophobia, and a hot spot of verbal and physical violence against LGBT Americans is the school. Whether the torment occurs on the playground, the cafeteria or the Twittersphere, LGBT youth have been forced for years to weather barrages of insensitivity from peers who have been trained by society to fear and mock differences. Much of this ignorance comes from very set gender stereotypes that this nation has subscribed to for centuries, especially in its youth directed messages.
Even after a year of existence, children are assailed with clear messages as to what path they must follow according to their gender. Girls wear pink and play with dolls and boys roll in the mud and like trucks and so on. Imagine how easy it must be to fasten to these roles and believe that anyone who colors outside the lines is an aberration, especially if schools promote these stereotypes. Single-sex schools are already in the practice of defining gender by separation which forces transgender students into the margin.
But it doesn't end there. Its understood in these institutions, besides the fact that there is no solid scientific evidence, that girls and boys have vastly different learning styles which must be catered to by vastly different curricula and environments. Single-sex schools geared toward at risk, low-income youth are ineffective and promote racial separation – Young Latin American and Black men are identified as the most "at risk" demographic in the nation.
These are not encouraging statistics, but how do the education boards, mayors and counselors respond? Segregate these boys into single-sex education institutions, ostensibly to remove outside and potentially distracting influences. What they are doing instead is encouraging a quarantine effect, which does nothing to encourage the boys educational drive but perpetuates the notion that these boys spell trouble and affirms society's desire to steer clear.
In there was only one single-sex public school in the United States, today there are over fully segregated public or charter schools. Most of these news schools were specifically created for Black and Latin American boys, to "save" them by separating them from the rest of society.
What's more, there is no substantive research to back any of these instituion's practices. Does an at risk young man really fare that much better without girls in the classroom? Research has proven that what in fact does make a difference in the lives of at risk youth is fostering strong community connections, providing engaging extracurriculars and creating healthy relationships with mentors and teachers.
So what are these single-sex boys schools really doing? They are separating the problem, removing the demographic targeted as the most dangerous or in the need of the most help, depending how you see it to national education statistics. Single-sex education has become another way isolate, and ultimately ignore, our country's issues.
Read more articles here and here about the effect of single-sex education on our society. The Dangers of Single-Sex Education. Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Print. And last year, the ACLU wrote a letter compelling the Sanford School Department to end single-sex education practice A Feminist Minority Report stated that more than 1, public schools segregated at least some of their classes after when the Title IX regulations changed.
Here's two major reasons why single-sex education can do more harm than good: 1. Leave this field blank. Sign up. July 28,
– Single-sex schools are a bad place to begin a social life – Shout Out UK
In her first days on the job, L. In the s, retired Harvard professor Edward H. Clarke ignited popular interest in single-sex education — by arguing that exposing adolescent girls to the rigors of a standard education would cause their reproductive organs to wither. In the s, after racial segregation was declared unconstitutional, sex-segregated public schools were created across the South to keep boys and girls of different racial backgrounds apart. Yes, there are some terrific boys-only and girls-only public schools out there.
But are they great schools because they are single-sex? Today, in a major reversal, single-sex education has found political champions among supporters of gender equality and those who believe that black and Latino boys in particular will benefit from being educated apart from their female peers. In , then-Sen. Hilary Clinton co-sponsored a provision of the No Child Left Behind Act that provided federal funds to fledgling single-sex public schools, spurring local school districts across the country to experiment with sex segregation.
A few years later, however, a government-commissioned study noted a lack evidence proving that single-sex education improved student performance.
Today, there are nearly 80 single-sex public schools in the U. Hundreds more schools separate boys and girls during academic instruction, though the campuses are technically coed.
Allison published a meta-analysis of existing studies on single-sex instruction. Their exhaustive review found no significant advantage, for boys or girls, over coeducation. The evidence suggests not.
Research shows that successful schools do certain things — such as creating strong mentoring relationships and keeping class sizes to a manageable level — that benefit students whether boys and girls learn together or apart.
Meanwhile, evidence is mounting that single-sex education can do real harm by perpetuating limiting gender stereotypes. As a result, boys are being deprived of the opportunity to develop crucial social skills, such as working collaboratively and thinking creatively, while girls are being denied the opportunity to build test-taking skills and learn how to succeed under pressure.
But unless LAUSD takes a critical look at the facts and research on single-sex education, it hardly can be expected to do any better moving forward. Juliet A. Follow the Opinion section on Twitter latimesopinion and Facebook. All Sections. About Us. B2B Publishing. Business Visionaries. Hot Property. Times Events. Times Store. Special Supplements. Facebook Twitter Show more sharing options Share Close extra sharing options. By Juliet A. Opinion Op-Ed. More From the Los Angeles Times. Opinion Endorsement: Six for the Superior Court.
Opinion Op-Ed: Black people are wrongly convicted more than any other group. We can prevent this.